On Jul 18, 8:36 am, peter.prav..._at_gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Runnning a system statistics on the oracle 10.2 RAC cluster with SAN
> storage gives me the results below. The block size is 8192 and the
> multiblock read count is 32 , what i would like to know is if
> sreadtime of 11 ms and mreadtim of 20 ms are acceptable numbers.
>
> Thanks
>
> PNAME PVAL1
> ------------------------------ ----------------------
> CPUSPEEDNW 1139.96075866579
> IOSEEKTIM 10
> IOTFRSPEED 4096
> SREADTIM 11.522
> MREADTIM 20.741
> CPUSPEED 1280
> MBRC 186
> MAXTHR 36916224
> SLAVETHR 676864
Seems slow to me, see http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/2007/03/20/san-array-cache-and-filers-hate-sequential-writes/
http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/2007/02/10/netapp-ontap-gx-specialized-for-transaction-logging/
and associated links, and especially http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/system-stats-strategy/
.
jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
Q: Dear Dr. Science,I've heard of vicious circles. Do the other
geometric shapes have corresponding moods? - Leeann Cronbaugh
A: They do, but most are much nicer than the mean-spirited circle.
Ovals are graceful, spirals are sensuous and French curves are
positively sexy. On the other hand, squares are boring and triangles
are grating, while rectangles are second rate squares, and trapezoids
are defective rectangles. As we progress along the axis of negativity,
parallelograms are drunken rectangles, rhomboids are squares with a
drinking problem that hasn't yet progressed to true alcoholism, and
parabolas are ovals with a pathological fear of commitment that causes
them to remain perpetually open-ended. So compared to the rest of this
geometric menagerie of dysfunction, circles aren't much worse than the
norm.
Received on Thu Jul 19 2007 - 13:30:24 CDT
