Re: Comparison of Oracle commans Vs. SQL Server Commands

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 11:15:47 -0700
Message-ID: <1180376147.132147@bubbleator.drizzle.com>

David Portas wrote:
> On 27 May, 19:38, DA Morgan <damor..._at_psoug.org> wrote:

>> euan.gar..._at_gmail.com wrote:
>>> If I thought there was the slightest chance of you presenting an
>>> appropriate balanced article with the data I would, but as thats not
>>> going to happen I am not going to waste my time.
>> My interpretation of your remark is that you made it up.
>>
>> Everyone else that has sent me a comment, when validated, has seen it
>> posted with in 24 hours.

>
>
> Daniel, some time ago I pointed out that your description of Second
> Normal Form is wrong:
> http://www.psoug.org/reference/normalization.html
>
> Also, that you wrongly described Oracle proprietary joins as "ISO"
> http://www.psoug.org/reference/joins.html
>
> When I get chance I'll review your SQL Server comparison document and
> send you some feedback.
>
> --
> David Portas

Thanks.

With respect to the 2NF definition I have looked at it several times and do not see the issue to which you are alluding. Please contact me off-line and be specific.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org

Received on Mon May 28 2007 - 13:15:47 CDT