Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: String concatenation in group by?
<gordon_t_wu_at_hotmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news: 1178209991.303094.297830_at_y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On May 1, 12:01 pm, "fitzjarr..._at_cox.net" <fitzjarr..._at_cox.net> wrote:
> On May 1, 10:28 am, Tao <gordon.t..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Sorry mother.
> > So out of 5 ways, the 4th one might apply in my case. What makes you
> > think I have no right to ask for ppl's opinion if there is a easier
> > way that I didn't see? That offended you so much didn't it.
>
> > On May 1, 11:10 am, "Michel Cadot" <micadot{at}altern{dot}org> wrote:
>
> > > "Tao" <gordon.t..._at_gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news: 1178031718.880006.168..._at_h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> > > Micel,
>
> > > I believe I've mentioned that I'm still using Oracle 9.2 so 10g's
> > > "collect" function is of no use to me.
> > > Yes I understand any string manipulation can be done using PL/SQL
> > > functions, thanks.
>
> > > ---------------------------------
>
> > > "collect" is just the last explained way, there 4 others available in 9.2
> > > and one does not use PL/SQL.
>
> > > Regards
> > > Michel Cadot- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> What makes you think Michel, or anyone here, thinks that? Are your
> sensibilities so fragile that any comment, no matter the nature, is an
> attack on you? The response you received from Michel provided the
> requested information, and did so with a bit of humour. It is a
> shame you can't recognize good natured wordplay when it is presented
> to you.
>
> David Fitzjarrell
Because the word he was using "is" harsh? Maybe Tao over-looked an solution. But what these forums are for? That that gives Michel and you the right to bash him?
How does it come that your's and Tao's email are the same ones?
Regards
Michel Cadot
Received on Thu May 03 2007 - 12:06:48 CDT
![]() |
![]() |