Re: SPAM @ New York

From: Barry Bulsara <bbulsara23_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 20 Jan 2007 10:09:05 -0800
Message-ID: <1169316545.591447.162980@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

DA Morgan wrote:
> Personally I find it amazing that after I changed the subject to
> include the word "SPAM" you clicked on it anyway. I did that for a
> reason too.
>

Look you dim bastard, don't include the original spam message in your replies if you really really need to reply. Don't propagate the spam, get it!

And secondly, I didn't click on anything. You may read this group by e-mail or usenet when you click on the message, I read this group via an RSS feed where the content is displayed as it comes through. Your reply which contained the spam inline came through. I don't want to read the spam, none of us do, some of us have filters and kill files for it, but it got through because you distributed it AGAIN. Normally entities that propagate spam are spammers or viruses - you are not so stop redistributing the spam!
Barry Received on Sat Jan 20 2007 - 12:09:05 CST