Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: temp extent size
Hi Daniel ,
What more information you need, I think I can provide you more information !!
Please let me know ?
Regards,
Vinay
DA Morgan wrote:
> viny wrote:
> > Thanks for your response !!
> >
> > for more clarity :
> > My DB version is 9.2.0.6
> > OS is HP Unix 11i
> >
> > I am facing ORA-1652 even if I have sufficient Temp datafile more than
> > 4GB . I think only reason here, i see is Next extent ize is not proper
> > , which is 1M by default, /and that may have caused the fragmentation
> > in the temp tablespace. Due to which it is not able to provide
> > contiguous blocks for the user process.
> >
> > But I am not sure, how much should we use for extent size in case of
> > Temporary content type Temp tablespace?
> >
> > regards,
> > vinay
> >
> >
> >
> > DA Morgan wrote:
> >> viny wrote:
> >>> My sort area size is 8MB and db_block_size is 8KB
> >>>
> >>> I have created locally managed temporary tablespace. What should be
> >>> ideal value for INITIAL, NEXT extent size for the locally managed
> >>> temporary tablespace??
> >>>
> >>> I am using 8MB+8KB extent size. Is it higher/lower? Need the suggestion
> >>> asap.
> >>>
> >>> thanks in advance !!
> >>>
> >>> regards,
> >>> vinay
> >> Could you please restate your question, adding your version number and
> >> operating system, and strive for greater clarity.
> >>
> >> The default is 1M for each and I wouldn't change that without some
> >> metrics giving a reason to make a different choice.
> >> --
> >> Daniel A. Morgan
> >> University of Washington
> >> damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
> >> (replace x with u to respond)
> >> Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
> >> www.psoug.org
>
>
![]() |
![]() |