Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Is this a bug?
Galen Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Jan 2007, damorgan_at_psoug.org wrote: >> Anurag Varma wrote:
>>>> EscVector wrote: >>>>> Anurag Varma wrote:
>>>>>> You are right .. it should be a bug. However, probably not easy >>>>>> to fix ... >>>>>> >>>>>> You might want to read Bug 4703738 where this is discussed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Anurag >>>>> Quote from doc: >>>>> This issue is fixed in >>>>> * 9.2.0.8 (Server Patch Set) >>>>> >>>>> Well they didn't kill this bug. It is back again in 10.2.0.2 :) >>>> I'm not quite sure I can agree that something violating Oracle's >>>> advice, and generating an error, is a bug. At least not as long as >>>> the word TIMESTAMP is present in gv$reserved_words. -- Daniel >>>> A. Morgan
>> I would agree that throwing an error would be a "nice to have" but I >> wouldn't call it a bug any more than I would expect Oracle to hold my >> hand if I am fool enough to write this code. >> >> CREATE SYNONYM dummy FOR dual; >> >> set serveroutput on >> >> DECLARE >> dummy VARCHAR2(1); >> BEGIN >> SELECT dummy >> INTO dummy >> FROM dummy; >> >> dbms_output.put_line(dummy); >> END; >> / > > You don't think that out of the thousands of people using the product, > there aren't quite a few people who would make this simple mistake?
Think so? I hope so. How else are consultants and educators going to make a living?
I've made far more money from other people's mistakes than from my own. ;-)
-- Daniel A. Morgan University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond) Puget Sound Oracle Users Group www.psoug.orgReceived on Fri Jan 05 2007 - 14:20:17 CST
![]() |
![]() |