hpuxrac wrote:
> Jim Smith wrote:
>> In message <1167866459.800948_at_bubbleator.drizzle.com>, DA Morgan
>> <damorgan_at_psoug.org> writes
>>> EscVector wrote:
>>>> Anurag Varma wrote:
>>>>> EscVector wrote:
>>>>>> As demonstrated below, a table can be created with data type
>>>>>> "timestamp" as a column name.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This causes a subsequent issue when creating triggers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shouldn't the table create throw a "ORA-00904: : invalid identifier"
>>>>>> error?
>>>>>>
>>> I'm not quite sure I can agree that something violating Oracle's advice,
>>> and generating an error, is a bug. At least not as long as the word
>>> TIMESTAMP is present in gv$reserved_words.
>> The "bug" is that it *isn't* generating an error.
>
> Ahh but now you are trying to imply that the person responding is
> actually trying to read the post and trying to understand it instead of
> just blasting out spam.
I confess. My post was pure spam. I wanted everyone to purchase a copy
of gv$reserved_words from me. I have three copies on the lot that were
previously owned by a little old lady who only queried them on Sundays
after church. And they all come with a full warranty. ROFLOL!
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org
Received on Thu Jan 04 2007 - 17:29:41 CST
