Just curious, why are you doing this? You are load balancing with 2
listeners on the same server is sounds like, not a great idea. The bang
for the buck is very low on this, the database or server has a much
greater chance of crashing before the listener in my
opinion/experience. Plus, load balancing two listeners on the same
server is most likely not going to do anything unless you are expecting
an enourmous amount of concurrent connections and if that is the case,
two listeners is not going to buy you much. What is the logic for this
and what is your actual configuration?
Mike Fullerton
RA wrote:
> Hi EdStevens,
>
> Could you please point me to the right page number or code itself. I
> looked into the manual, I coudn't figureout.
>
> Thank you
> Janu
>
>
> EdStevens wrote:
> > RA wrote:
> > > Thanks for all the replys.
> > >
> > > Could someone give me a sample code. On the metalink and web search, I
> > > could find solutions for the RAC configuration. I am looking for a
> > > non-RAC solution, where you have two listeners to support 1 or more
> > > DBs. In my case, I have 3 databases and I want to have 2 listeners with
> > > failover and load balancing.
> > >
> > > Thank
> > > Janu
> >
> > To quote Sybrand: "Sample code can be found in the Net administrators
> > manual. "
Received on Wed Jan 03 2007 - 23:27:34 CST
