joel garry wrote:
> joel garry wrote:
>> DA Morgan wrote:
>>> joel garry wrote:
>>>> They would likely find Note:174782.1, tell him someone else was
>>>> updating an object so Oracle wouldn't be able to make a read-consistent
>>>> view of the data for exp, and to use consistent=n as a workaround.
>>> I looked for that and didn't find it. You obviously used better
>>> search criteria than I.
>> KISS: ora-1555 consistent=Y
>
> Apologies! A slightly different search: ora-1555 consistent=N
>
> They both give 3 answers, but not exactly the same 3 (and I was just
> looking at the first few numbers of the notes). :-/
>
> jg
Thanks. That likely explains my failure. Well that and a lack of
mental agility.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org
Received on Tue Dec 19 2006 - 16:58:15 CST
