Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Index based database?
DA Morgan wrote:
> EscVector wrote:
> > The tables are not narrow.
> > Example 27 col table has 26 single column indexes.
> >
> > Still normal?
> >
> >
> > Jim Smith wrote:
> >> In message <1166109023.164657.84250_at_l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>,
> >> EscVector <Junk_at_webthere.com> writes
> >>> I've seen this a few times since getting into Warehousing, but I need a
> >>> sanity check.
> >>>
> >>> How often has anyone seen the total INDEX bytes exceed DATA bytes,
> >>> meaning I have more data stored in standard indexes, not index
> >>> organized tables, than regular heap tables.
> >>>
> >> It is not unusual.
> >>
> >> Given the rowid overhead in an index, if the table is quite narrow a
> >> single index could easily be larger than the table. If you have multiple
> >> indexes the total index space could be several times the size of the
> >> table.
> >> --
> >> Jim Smith
> >> Ponder Stibbons Limited <http://oracleandting.blogspot.com/>
> >> RSS <http://oracleandting.blogspot.com/atom.xml>
>
>
>
Sorry about the top post.... Was in beta and screwed up..
Answer:
1. Kimbal Based Warehouse no legacy OLTP and no ODS, designed for
warehouse/reporting
2. Indexes being used: not always - but that's another issue.
3. Index type = B*Tree, all B*Tree
4. Database Versions (see below)
COMP_ID COMP_NAME VERSION STATU CATALOG Oracle Database Catalog Views 10.2.0.2.0 VALID CATPROC Oracle Database Packages and Types 10.2.0.2.0 VALID OWM Oracle Workspace Manager 10.2.0.1.0 VALID JAVAVM JServer JAVA Virtual Machine 10.2.0.2.0 VALID XML Oracle XDK 10.2.0.2.0 VALID CATJAVA Oracle Database Java Packages 10.2.0.2.0 VALID EXF Oracle Expression Filter 10.2.0.2.0 VALID XDB Oracle XML Database 10.2.0.2.0 VALID RUL Oracle Rules Manager