Adrian Simpson schreef:
> number of rows. Whether or not at 16 the parallelisation is right for
> this sort of figure I'm not sure, but we did notice an improvement
> elsewhere in the DB when we upped it from 8.
>
Just what I meant to say - there is a point where parallel
query will actually be faster. In the other cases, parallel
query will cause substantial delays.
But I doubt whether that point is much less than 200k rows.
And that is indeed for you to find out...
--
Regards,
Frank van Bortel
Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
Received on Sat Sep 16 2006 - 03:45:06 CDT
