Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle Benchmark Results for Different Hardware Configurations?
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:45:26 +0000, Bob Jones wrote:
>>>> http://www.tpc.org ???
>>> Two issues with the site:
>>>
>>> 1. You may not find the exact configurations.
>>
>> In order for a benchmark to be published, the exact confirguration must be
>> defined in the benchmark.
>>
> What I meant was OP's exact configurations.
You'll never find the 'exact configuration' for the OP's system - even on the OP's site. 15 minutes after it's installed, it's probably changed.
>> Whether you can purchase such a configuration is immaterial ... at
>> least you know what is similar and what is significantly different.
>>
> We are not talking about whether you can purchase similar equipments. We > are talking about whether you can evaluate your configurations using > tpc.org as a guide or even a clue.
Exactly ... and one can ...
>>> 2. You will not likely archive the same performance with your
>>> applications.
>>
>> Very true. Few people, or organizations, are willing to put in the
>> effort to do that level of tuning - and the tuning only needs to be
>> valid for a relatively short period of time.
>>
> Not just the level of tuning, but more importantly the type of
> applications.
Applications are what we tune.
>> Yet - when trying to determine which hardware to get it is useful to
>> have some starting point, no matter how artifically derived. There are
>> a large number of variables in any benchmark and the TPC at least makes
>> some attempt to define them and to hold some of them to a relative
>> constant. (Then at least you have some ammo when trying to get a
>> discount on the equipment management has already, behind your back,
>> decided to purchase.)
>>
> If a large number of variables do not matter, then one could use a HP's
> hardware benchmark to be the starting point of a Sun purchase.
One can. Many do.
At least TCP attempt to hold some of them (such as type & qty of workload, type of app) constant to give the analysis a bit of an even keel.
-- Hans Forbrich (mailto: Fuzzy.GreyBeard_at_gmail.com) *** Feel free to correct me when I'm wrong! *** Top posting [replies] guarantees I won't respond.Received on Tue Sep 12 2006 - 20:18:27 CDT
![]() |
![]() |