nicklas.lundgren_at_triacon.se wrote:
> Yes I know it should have been patched. The problem is that the new DBA
> at the site installed this, not me. Then it will require downtime to
> patch and the customer won't accept that. This is a big problem for me
> that is asked to fix problems with my hands tied :(
>
>
> DA Morgan wrote:
>> nicklas.lundgren_at_triacon.se wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I have a job that should run every minute, this works fine for a while
>>> but then all of a sudden it stops to be executed. The parameter:
>>> job_queue_processes is set to 10 and I have only six jobs. If I run
>>> this job manually it then runs for one or two days but then it just
>>> stops to be executed again.
>>> This is a Oracle 9.2.0.1 database.
>>>
>>> Can anybody help me, that would really be appriciated.
>> Just a thought ... why in 9.2.0.1? Oracle has released a rather
>> substantial number of meaningful patches in the last 5 years. I would
>> suggest patching up to at least 9.2.0.6 at a minimum.
>> --
>> Daniel A. Morgan
>> University of Washington
>> damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
>> (replace x with u to respond)
>> Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
>> www.psoug.org
>
- Please do not top post. Scroll to the bottom to reply.
- So the DBA prefers downtime for problems such as this to downtime
for applying the appropriate patches? My impression is that
management needs to re-evaluate this DBAs qualification for the
job. My instinct would be that they made a bad choice.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org
Received on Tue Aug 22 2006 - 12:50:02 CDT
