Re: Oracle slowed down

From: Bob Jones <email_at_me.not>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 13:49:18 GMT
Message-ID: <yBL2g.63313$F_3.45054@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>

"Frank van Bortel" <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com> wrote in message news:e2flne$mav$1_at_news6.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...

> Bob Jones wrote:

>> "Frank van Bortel" <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:e2dgou$vlv$1_at_news6.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...

>>> Bob Jones wrote:
>>> -
>>>> Sure, have you ever seen a system with 30% performing better than 100%,
>>>> provided everything else being equal other than the buffer cache.
>>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>

>> So you have seen 2 completely identical systems, apart from the buffer
>> cache, the one with 30% hits outperforms the other with 100% hits. You
>> must
>> have disks that are faster than memory.

>>
>>
>
> You're wrong, again.
> BCHR does not say a thing about performance.
>

If you have seen such systems, I don't doubt you come up with this conclusion. Received on Sun Apr 23 2006 - 08:49:18 CDT