Re: Perl and Oracle

From: <xhoster_at_gmail.com>
Date: 17 Apr 2006 17:19:28 GMT
Message-ID: <20060417133222.928$mz@newsreader.com>

Mladen Gogala <gogala_at_sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:32:36 +0000, xhoster wrote:
>
> > And what isn't internally broken into loops? That is what computers
> > do.
>
> This type of debate doesn't interest me. I'm not a little kid. Not
> supporting the array interface is a cardinal sin which has a grave impact
> on performance, period. That makes the usability of DBD::Oracle limited
> at best. Is that so hard to understand? The same feature is supported for
> MySQL

Can you back up that assertion? What version of MySQL even has an array interface, and what version of DBD::mysql supports the native MySQL array interface?

> which points toward bias.

Or, in the unlikely case that your claim is actually true, it points towards it being easier to implement for MySQL rather than for Oracle.

Xho

-- 
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
Usenet Newsgroup Service                        $9.95/Month 30GB

Received on Mon Apr 17 2006 - 12:19:28 CDT