Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Different OS versions between Test and Prod
"DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote in message news:1144262320.600568_at_yasure.drizzle.com...
> Bob Jones wrote: >> "DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote in message >> news:1144177633.580918_at_yasure.drizzle.com...
>>>> "DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote in message >>>> news:1143825073.91644_at_yasure.drizzle.com... >>>>> Dave wrote: >>>>>> I agree that risk is minimal but I guess i'm wondering if I should >>>>>> put >>>>>> myself in a situation where they are out of sync if I don't need to. >>>>>> I >>>>>> fully agree that we should upgrade to Solaris 10 but I would rather >>>>>> have a plan in place to upgrade all our environments instead of >>>>>> having >>>>>> descrepancies. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just knowing how long it takes to get things done in our environment, >>>>>> if there is no plan now, then it isn't on the radar for the >>>>>> forseeable >>>>>> future. I'd have no issues with them being out of sync for 6 months >>>>>> but no more than that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Backup and recovery isn't an issue, we have a good plan for that. I >>>>>> don't think there are any dependancies based on OS version. >>>>> You MUST upgrade DEV before TEST. You MUST upgrade TEST before PROD. >>>>> So why the resistance to being out of synch? Just make sure that you >>>>> have a well thought out, well documented, upgrade plan that moves the >>>>> code through all three stages. >>>>> -- >>>> Hmmmmm, that seems to be conflicting with what you said in the other >>>> subthread.
>> >> You must not have read OP's question carefully. He said they have no plan >> to upgrade prod to Solaris 10. > > Which in my mind meant that dev and test MUST stay at the earlier version. > Was I unclear in what I posted? > --
He does not have separate test and dev. Received on Wed Apr 05 2006 - 19:23:26 CDT
![]() |
![]() |