Re: Oralce 10g2/RAC on AIX. ASM or GPFS?

From: <tangdba_at_gmail.com>
Date: 29 Mar 2006 23:53:09 -0800
Message-ID: <1143705189.724444.287070@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>

You already have EMC SAN with external redundancy. So I guess you don't use ASM for redundancy. Using GPFS would be a better choice since you have more control on your system. However, licenses of most commercial cluster file systems are expensive. If cost is an issue, you may want to consider the free OCFS on Linux. I'm using it for 10g RAC on RHEL AS and HDS (Hitachi data system) and it works fine. Received on Thu Mar 30 2006 - 01:53:09 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: eric.h.lin_at_gmail.com: "Re: Get the sql query in oracle trigger"
Previous message: mccmx_at_hotmail.com: "Re: 10053 Interpretation...."
In reply to: Karma: "Oralce 10g2/RAC on AIX. ASM or GPFS?"
Next in thread: Laurenz Albe: "Re: Oralce 10g2/RAC on AIX. ASM or GPFS?"
Reply: Laurenz Albe: "Re: Oralce 10g2/RAC on AIX. ASM or GPFS?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US