Re: Oracle RDBMS version 11 status?

From: HansF <News.Hans_at_telus.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:49:07 GMT
Message-Id: <pan.2006.03.12.15.49.11.668590@telus.net>

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:39:53 +0100, Lothar Armbruester wrote:

> But we had two releases with i (8i and 9i) so wouldn't the pattern
> suggest 11g and after that 12e? :-)
>

Possibly.

Or since 11? is associated with apps (and, for some, the association is not entirely pleasant) , perhaps they'll leave the numbering alone and go to some different scheme for the core technologies... Received on Sun Mar 12 2006 - 09:49:07 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Beatrice Smith: "OBS"
Previous message: Thorsten Jens: "Re: ksu process alloc latch yield"
In reply to: Lothar Armbruester: "Re: Oracle RDBMS version 11 status?"
Next in thread: Mladen Gogala: "Re: Oracle RDBMS version 11 status?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US