Re: Oracle RDBMS version 11 status?

From: HansF <News.Hans_at_telus.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:21:07 GMT
Message-Id: <pan.2006.03.10.20.21.09.669636@telus.net>

On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:01:05 -0800, Joel Garry wrote:

>
> HansF wrote:
>
> Didn't noons predict it woud be 11f? :-)
>

That would not follow the pattern - should be 11e - i [h] g [f] e

I use 'q' for 'quintessentially ubiquitous'

-- 
Hans Forbrich                           
Canada-wide Oracle training and consulting
mailto: Fuzzy.GreyBeard_at_gmail.com   
*** Top posting [replies] guarantees I won't respond. ***

Received on Fri Mar 10 2006 - 14:21:07 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Herod: "Re: Oracle Sorts Using Single-Threaded Temp File"
Previous message: Joel Garry: "Re: hpux 11.0 hpux 11i"
In reply to: Joel Garry: "Re: Oracle RDBMS version 11 status?"
Next in thread: Lothar Armbruester: "Re: Oracle RDBMS version 11 status?"
Reply: Lothar Armbruester: "Re: Oracle RDBMS version 11 status?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US