Re: Why use Java Stored Procedures....

From: HansF <News.Hans_at_telus.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 23:59:33 GMT
Message-Id: <pan.2006.03.04.23.59.29.686441@telus.net>

On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 23:26:47 +0000, Bob Jones wrote:

>
> "HansF" <News.Hans_at_telus.net> wrote in message
> news:pan.2006.03.03.20.05.02.904786_at_telus.net...

>> On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:13:49 +0000, Bob Jones wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Would you rather have a Java programmer migrating Java stored procedures 
>>> to
>>> a different database or have a PL/SQL programmer migrating PL/SQL stored
>>> procedures to a foreign language for a different database?
>>
>> Help me out here .... which other databases use Java natively for Stored
>> Procedures.
>>
>> I'm not asking which databases can interact with or be used by Java.
>> Which ones allow Java to be stored and run under control of the database
>> kernel.
>>

>
> I am not sure what you meant by "native". What makes Java a native language
> only to Oracle but not to others?

OK - let's simplify.

Which databases can use JAVA *STORED PROCEDURES*. That is, procedures that are stored in the database.

>

>> It would be nice to see a list of all these potential targets for
>> migration of stored procedures without rewrites.
>>

>
> You are not going to see one. There are going to be rewrites. It is just a
> matter of how much.

Minimal rewrites.

-- 
Hans Forbrich                           
Canada-wide Oracle training and consulting
mailto: Fuzzy.GreyBeard_at_gmail.com   
*** Top posting [replies] guarantees I won't respond. ***

Received on Sat Mar 04 2006 - 17:59:33 CST