Re: oracle database and mac os x for intel

On 2006-01-13, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote:
> Joel Garry wrote:
>> hpuxrac wrote:
>>
>>>DA Morgan wrote:
>>># Embrace change. ;-)
>>>
>>>Here's a change you can get your arms around ...
>>>
>>>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/01/11/sun_and_oracle/
>>
>>
>> I only found one reference to this on the Sun site, and it didn't say
>> anything about exactly which license... XP on a 72-way sunfire? :-)
>>
>> jg
>> --
>> @home.com is bogus.
>> "For years I've been saying that if the plural of index is indices,
>> then the plural of Kleenex should be Kleenices." - Dan Schechner
>
> I've no doubt there is some fire in the smoke.
>
> Part of what we hoped to accomplish with Apple was to drive Sun and
> the others back to reality pricing wise. It seems to be working though
> it is too soon to tell.

        Um, yeah. The dual only vendor is going to whip Sun back into line.

 Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services

• SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **

  ---

  http://www.usenet.com