Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle not using Bitmap Join Index
bob_monkhouse35_at_hotmail.com wrote:
> I'm trying to speed up a query that is being generated from an
> application. The application (there the sql itself) cannot be
> modified. Therefore I was investigating using bitmap join indexes to
> help speed things up as there are some joins on large tables (700k rows
> +).
Why not? Many applications have the possibility to store the query, instead of (re-)generating it over and over again.
> Here's the sql generated by the app:
>
> SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT(OBJ.OBJECTID))
> FROM REVS OBJ, CLASS CLS,ATTRS ATT_C1,CATTRS
> ATTC_C1,OBJATTR REL_C1
> WHERE (OBJ.UNIQUEKEY LIKE 'D%'
> AND OBJ.CLSOBJECTID = CLS.OBJECTID
> AND OBJ.NAME LIKE '30%'
> AND (ATTC_C1.CATTRSNAME = 'SECURELEVEL'
> AND ATT_C1.CATTRSOBJECTID = ATTC_C1.OBJECTID
> AND REL_C1.RIGHTOBJECTID = ATT_C1.OBJECTID
> AND REL_C1.LEFTOBJECTID = OBJ.OBJECTID
> AND ATT_C1.VALUE = 'secure')
>
> The OBJATTR table is big and is being used in the join
> ATT_C1.CATTRSOBJECTID = ATTC_C1.OBJECTID so this is what I wanted use
> in the bitmap join index ...
Eh? Objectid seems like a unique identifier; bitmap indexes are usually
better when low-cardinality data (GENDER: M/F, MARRIED: Y/N, etc) comes
into play.
Not knowing your data, could you elaborate on what observations led
you to decide a bitmap index is in place?
Besides, I fail to see how OBJATTR (or: REL_C1) is used to join
ATT_C1 (Table: ATTR) with ATTC_C1 (Table: CATTRS)
>
> CREATE BITMAP INDEX revs_attrs
> ON objattr(revs.objectid)
> FROM objattr, revs
> WHERE objattr.rightobjectid=revs.objectid;
See above - why would this index speed up the join on attr and
cattr?
>
> Oracle doesn't use the bitmap join though, instead using the index on
> the OBJATTR.RIGHTOBJECTID instead.
> Any ideas as to why Oracle won't use the bitmap index? Is a bitmap
> index even the correct thing to use here? Is there any other way that
> I can speed things up??
>
More hardware. More statistics (did you analyze the index?)
Comments inline...
And, apart from always posting platform and Oracle version,
post explain plan, generated from trace files with performance
questions.
-- Regards, Frank van Bortel Top-posting is one way to shut me up...Received on Mon Jan 09 2006 - 13:53:04 CST
![]() |
![]() |