Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Correlated Subquery Performance Puzzle...
Let's forget the 10053 trace results.
When you add your criterium "AND asg1.effdt < = cal.dur"
the only line that changes is the following:
> INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'PS_SCH_CLND_TBL' (UNIQUE)
> (Cost=11 Card=2179 Bytes=37043)
because adding a ref. to the column DUR (which is the 2nd
field of your index key PS_SCH_CLND_TBL) requires much
more work from Oracle: couldn't it be something to start from
to further investigate your issue ?
Received on Thu Dec 22 2005 - 04:12:53 CST
![]() |
![]() |