Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: SAN versus NAS versus direct attached storage

Re: SAN versus NAS versus direct attached storage

From: Mark Townsend <markbtownsend_at_comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:11:25 -0800
Message-ID: <yKKdndwFpd39KTjenZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@comcast.com>


Andrew J. Kelly wrote:
> First off NAS is not supported for databases except for one condition
that
> has to use a trace flag.
>

This statement may be true for SQLServer but it is not for Oracle. As this thread is cross-posted to both groups, responders should be very clear in their replies about which technology solution they are talking about, especially when it comes to limitations

To the OP - for Oracle, you may want to check out the white papers etc at
http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/availability/htdocs/storage_overview.html and at
http://www.oracle.com/technology/deploy/availability/techlisting.html#DS

In particular, you may want to look at something called Automatic Storage Management
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/asm/index.html

(You may need an OTN logon to access these docs - note that it is free) Received on Sun Dec 18 2005 - 13:11:25 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US