Bob Jones wrote:
> "HansF" <News.Hans_at_telus.net> wrote in message
> news:pan.2005.12.09.16.42.10.909525_at_telus.net...
>
>>On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:20:14 +0000, Bob Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>That's exactly what I disagree with. What is Oracle's concept? RAC
>
> cannot
>
>>>>have more than 4 CPUs per node?
>>>
>>>What does that have to do with whether Itanium is more scalable than
>
> Opteron
>
>>>or not?
>>>
>>
>>Has nothing to do with Itanium. Has everything to do with your 4-CPU
>>question. And there has everything to do with Oracle RAC message - it's
>>ALL in the economics.
>>
>
>
> You are not only off the topic, the comparisons you made earlier did not
> show anything. If you want to talk about which configuraton is more
> economical, I would be happy to discuss in a different thread. This thread
> is NOT about economics. READ THE THREAD.
Wrong Bob. RAC is about scaling with commodity boxes ... boxes with 2 or
4 CPUs. Thus your argument about Itanium scaling beyond 4 CPUs is
irrelevant. But you just don't want to read the Oracle docs and
acknowledge your error do you? Fine ... This thread is now kill-filed.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Received on Sat Dec 10 2005 - 12:34:37 CST
