Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Hardware Replication vs DataGuard
Rodrick Brown wrote:
> "DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_psoug.org> wrote in message
> news:1133727356.397234_at_jetspin.drizzle.com...
>
>>Rodrick Brown wrote: >> >>>Putting costs aside what do most people think about using hardware san >>>replication technologies like SRDF/Truecopy etc.. for replicating Oracle >>>volumes at a block level to a remote instance of Oracle ? vs using >>>something like dataguard, I know dataguard allows you to have read only >>>access to that data which I think is its biggest plus, but for disaster >>>recovery reasons only what would be a better solution. >> >>How does one put cost aside? It is substantial. >>
I'd still be inclined toward DataGuard for one major reason: If something goes terribly wrong ... I know who to call and there won't be any finger pointing.
-- Daniel A. Morgan http://www.psoug.org damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)Received on Sun Dec 04 2005 - 17:45:22 CST
![]() |
![]() |