Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: informix market share
RollForward Wizard wrote:
> mjbox01_at_gmail.com wrote:
> > RollForward Wizard wrote:
> >> mjbox01_at_gmail.com wrote:
> >>> RollForward Wizard wrote:
> >>>> mjbox01_at_gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>> RollForward Wizard wrote:
> >>>> But back to my original point, you won't convince me that "Oracle is
> >>>> as easy to use as DB2". I just won't believe it.
> >>> I was not trying to convince you, just pointing out that your view of
> >>> ease of use is not universal and is therefore a meaningless point to
> >>> raise. No matter how many times and ways you say it or the number of
> >>> capital letters you use.
> >>>
> >> It's not meaningless, obviously you found something about it that had
> >> meaning.
> >
> > I pointed out that I found your post to be meaningless, because
> > surprise, I found it meaningless.
> >
> > Obviously you are wrong again.
> >
>
You were wrong about Oracle not having technical merit.
The only reason you gave for this was that you find it harder to learn than other databases. Obviously this is only one viewpoint, as I for example have another, and some people even prefer Pick for exactly the same reason. This is the meaningless part.
You were then wrong about me not finding your opinions meaningless in the context of a technical discussion, because I do. I am not going to attempt to change your mind on this, and despite judicious use of capital letters you won't change mine.
Is this still too difficult? Received on Tue Nov 29 2005 - 19:26:05 CST
![]() |
![]() |