HansF wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:07:31 -0500, rkusenet wrote:
>
> >
> > Also it is important to note that SQL Server grew by 18% despite
> > not coming out with any new version. In fact in 2004 SS2000 was
> > 4 yrs old. Tells a lot about it, right?
>
> Based on what? Once upon a time, Microsoft used to count any delivery of
> any Microsoft OS as a client to SQL Server and included that in the total
> of delivered SQL Server installations, whether used or not. Makes one
> wonder if such reporting is reoccurring.
It's a Gartner market "analysis". Any semblance to what the
real world does is pure coincidence...
Received on Sun Nov 27 2005 - 23:45:55 CST
