Mark A wrote:
> "Noons" <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:43897afa$0$10216$5a62ac22_at_per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
>>Aye! Don't go there, Mark. Deep waters,
>>moving sand. The killer is the "or Oracle"...
>>Bad. Very bad.
>>;)
>>
>>--
>>Cheers
>>Nuno Souto
>
>
> Actually, I agree that you don't "need" to reorg indexes in either database,
> but reorgs of indexes do have some benefits after a lot of update activity.
Speak on something you supposedly know ... DB2. This is absolutely
untrue for Oracle.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Received on Sun Nov 27 2005 - 15:52:13 CST
