Re: DB2 HADB

From: Mark A <nobody_at_nowhere.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:52:50 -0700
Message-ID: <17adnVj128hDLBrenZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@comcast.com>

"Mark Townsend" <markbtownsend_at_comcast.net> wrote in message news:4387A5EB.3090804_at_comcast.net...
> You are talking about a clustering index in DB2 parlance, correct ? Why do
> you think that Oracle's table clustering (supporting both single and
> multiple tables, as well as hash clustering) is not similar (and indeed,
> possibly a superset) to what IBM provides ?

I don't want to get into a debate about which is better.

I answered the question by Noons about why DB2 tables need to be reorganized, and most Oracle DBA's seldom reorg tables. I answered the question accurately. Received on Fri Nov 25 2005 - 18:52:50 CST