Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle on Solaris: separate disks or concatenate?

Re: Oracle on Solaris: separate disks or concatenate?

From: Frank van Bortel <frank.van.bortel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 20:43:09 +0200
Message-ID: <di16c3$egv$3@news6.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>


DA Morgan wrote:

> David Mathog wrote:
> 

>> We are going to add another 200-300Gb of storage to
>> this system, probably with a U320 SCSI adapter in the
>> SunFire attached to some sort of rack mounted JBOD, using either
>> direct SCSI to SCSI or maybe SCSI to SATA. What I'm
>> trying to determine is, given that 100% of the data that
>> will be held on this new storage will consist of
>> Oracle files, is there any advantage, performance or
>> otherwise, in making those disks into another md volume?
>> Thoughts and/or suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David Mathog
>> mathog_at_caltech.edu
> 
> 
> For far less money you could purchase a 7TB SAN from Apple
> and have better performance plus reliability your current
> system can't offer. Contact me off-line at the University of
> Washington and I'd be glad to help you.

As I happen to have a 4500 Enterprise with 6 or 8 procs and 16GB memory and 3 fiber attached storage racks lying around, am would be interested in any thoughts regarding the disk layout.
Time permitting, I am willing to (have) investigate(d) if different configurations do matter.

-- 
Regards,
Frank van Bortel

Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
Received on Wed Oct 05 2005 - 13:43:09 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US