PJ6 apparently said,on my timestamp of 22/09/2005 12:53 AM:
> twice as expensive, seems to me a lot harder to maintain. I never ran into
> something I couldn't do in MS SQL - why exactly would anyone go through the
> extra expense and hassle of using Oracle instead?
No reason. It's just a bunch of idiots with no IT
training whatsoever who keep pushing Oracle.
At the very least a conspiracy because no one in
their right mind would ever run anything other
than a PC with M$ products in it.
--
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia, rolling his eyes...
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
Received on Thu Sep 22 2005 - 02:01:03 CDT
