Re: 10g Bug with Numeric Precision/Scale?

Daniel A Morgans defence team fitzjarrell_at_cox.net said on my timestamp 09/09/2005 13:32

> Strange how this is the *only* contribution you've made to this
> newsgroup and it is anything but helpful. Possibly I missed your large
> volume of inaightful responses to the myriad people who post here.
> But, I doubt it.

1. I have posted over 80 times to comp.databases.oracle.* under my own name. You have not missed my inaightful responses, you have complimented me on them!
2. It is not a knee-jerk assessment of him. I have had this opinion for over two years. I am not alone. He is a first class arsehole.
3. I am not surprised that you have jumped in to defend him. You do it often.

> Godfrey wrote:
> > Mr nice guy Daniel A. Morgan said on my timestamp 09/07/2005 14:32
> > >
> > > I can't go into what I ran it on where it ran correctly due to NDA but
> > > I wasn't where I thought I was. Sorry.
> > > --
> > > Daniel A. Morgan
> > > http://www.psoug.org
> > > damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
> >
> >
> > Yeah right! We believe you. You posted another unhelpful response and
> > when challenged and realised you were wrong and are now trying to cover
> > your arse. You must think we are as stupid as you. Why dont you think
> > before you write arsehole.
>
> Strange how this is the *only* contribution you've made to this
> newsgroup and it is anything but helpful. Possibly I missed your large
> volume of inaightful responses to the myriad people who post here.
> But, I doubt it.
>
> You should take your own advice, vulgar as it may be, and think BEFORE
> YOU write. You are neither witty nor entertaining, and your
> 'knee-jerk' assessment of Daniel Morgan is anything but correct. This
> is to be expected from those with large mouths and small brains.
> You've proven yourself a possesor of both.
>
>
> David Fitzjarrell
Received on Fri Sep 09 2005 - 13:02:35 CDT