"StefanKapitza" <skapitza_at_volcanomail.com> wrote in message
news:1125038572.907967.175410_at_g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Wes Harrison wrote:
> > I am installing Oracle 10g 10.2.01 on Windows Server 2003 SP1 32-bit
edition
> > but for some strange reason the overall performance of the disks on the
> > server decreases after it is installed. I know this because I am using
> > SiSoft SANDRA Pro to do a File System Benchmark before and after the
> > installation. Before, the drive index is about 80MB/S but this
decreases by
> > half after Oracle is installed. If I uninstall Oracle, the drive index
> > returns to about 80. Reinstall Oracle and it goes back down to about
40.
> >
> > No other package that I have installed on this server has had this
effect.
> > So I figured it must have something to do with fragmentation but the
results
> > are unchanged after a full defrag.
> >
> > What could be causing this? Is it an error in the benchmark? Does it
have
> > something to do with some of the Oracle processes interfering with
SANDRA
> > Pro? It can't be just coincidence as I have repeated the test several
> > times.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Wes
>
> and what rate does a copy to dev null give ?
>
> regards
>
> Stefan Kapitza
>
He's using windows.
--
Andreas Sheriff
Oracle 9i Certified Professional
Oracle 10g Certified Professional
Oracle 9i Certified PL/SQL Developer
----
"If you don't eat your meat, you cannot have any pudding.
"How can you have any pudding, if you don't eat your meat?"
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL
Reply only to the group.
Received on Fri Aug 26 2005 - 01:50:10 CDT
