Re: performance break in check constraint

From: Mark C. Stock <mcstockX_at_Xenquery>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:54:14 -0400
Message-ID: <oc-dne7R-uoanpjeRVn-rw@comcast.com>

"jared" <jared_at_hwai.com> wrote in message news:1124400765.474577.310850_at_z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> It used to be a rule of thumb that one wanted no more than five or so
> values in a check constraint. Has that changed? I am in a discussion
> with a developer over this, and cannot find a reference in the doc set.
>
>
> TIA -
>
> Kind regards,
> jh
>

urban myth?

or rule-of-thumb indicating when some think it might make more sense to use a code table

++ mcs Received on Thu Aug 18 2005 - 16:54:14 CDT