Re: Patchset 9.2.0.6 stable ?

Don't really want to lose the function of Logminer, although I think we don't use it frequent enough to justify it as a show stopper. I think I'll go with 9.2.0.5 for the time being then.

Big thank you for everyone who shares the patchset experience.

"Dusan Bolek" <spambin_at_seznam.cz> wrote:

>Don wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are currently using 9.2.0.1.0 64bit on AIX 5L and considering
>patch
>> up to the latest level which is 9.2.0.6. Just wonder if anyone can
>> share experience with this patchset. Thanks ..
>
>Having the same platform, but with HACMP because of RAC. There are two
>quite nasty issues, see:
>
> Installed Patch List:
> =====================
> 1) Patch 3256015 applied on Tue Mar 15 20:44:54 GMT+01:00 2005
> [ Base Bug(s): 3256015 ]
> 2) Patch 4074633 applied on Sat Mar 12 18:45:03 GMT+01:00 2005
> [ Base Bug(s): 4074633 ]
>
>The bug 4074633 is about an excessive consumption of CPU resources
>after application of 9.2.0.6 (excessive means: eats all cpu even
>without any load), and the second one is a big number of ORA-07445s
>errors occurring after 9.2.0.6 (there is a bug in CBO that is causing
>this). Both of these patches were 100% mandatory for us and without
>them using of 9.2.0.6 wouldn't be possible. However, our 9.2.0.6
>production looks good now. Well, with an exception of the Logminer,
>which is not working at all and we're still working with the Oracle
>support on this (though it doesn't look like we're heading towards the
>solution for this. :-().
Received on Thu Mar 17 2005 - 11:49:39 CST