Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Development Trends in Web and Oracle
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au wrote:
> Galen Boyer apparently said,on my timestamp of 15/03/2005 1:00 PM:
>
>> One that I was involved in two projects ago. They passed XML >> around and >> it was immensely successful. >>
>> 2 years ago, Entity Beans were industry standard, stateful session >> beans were the rage and stateless session beans were the workhorses. >> They were part of the J2EE spec, so clearly, they were the correct >> way to go. Now, each one of those is shown to be horrific designs >> and they are starting to talk about Plain Old Java Objects, but I >> guess thats an architecture.
>> Quality is all about the architect and implementation. It can be >> done with java and XML.
The biggest problem is that they have the J2EE spec. The developers now don't have to argue the merit of the crap they put forth. They just say they are following the spec and industry standard. Meanwhile, the spec itself imposes an architecture that is slightly scalable at best. Entity Beans? Please. Everybody knows they suck, and 3-4 years ago I was arguing that they suck. It was clear from their architecture that they sucked. Didn't matter. The java crowd had the J2EE spec so they were doing the right thing.
The problem is the spec and the marching orders it affords everybody.
-- Galen deForest BoyerReceived on Tue Mar 15 2005 - 18:57:04 CST
![]() |
![]() |