Re: Development Trends in Web and Oracle

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 11:33:26 -0800
Message-ID: <1110655807.907071@yasure>

Hexathioorthooxalate wrote:

> "Noons" <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:4232e012$0$5486$5a62ac22_at_per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
>

>>The overhead?  36*2+1 longer to process a single byte.
>>How fast a modern CPU works is completely irrelevant.

>
>
> So you are saying the argument against storing XML in the database is a cost
> overhead for a bit of verbosity? That can't be the basis of your argument,
> surely?
>
> Hex

Let me guess ... you are a Java developer.

<LIGHT_HEARTED>
A bit of verbosity? I'd suggest getting back on your medication if you think this equates to "a bit of verbosity." </LIGHT_HEARTED>
It equates to tremendous overhead.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)

Received on Sat Mar 12 2005 - 13:33:26 CST