Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: DB2 UDB or Oracle (who has better support)
"JEDIDIAH" <jedi_at_nomad.mishnet> wrote in message
news:42307ce6$1_2_at_127.0.0.1...
> On 2005-03-04, DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:
> > Gert van der Kooij wrote:
> >
> >> In article <6q7f21prtalrm2ukrte4jsm5fdjsk1so92_at_4ax.com>, Sybrand
> >> Bakker (postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl) says...
> >>
> >>>On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 00:01:18 +0100, Gert van der Kooij
> >>><gert_at_invalid.nl> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>You're mixing up things. As Serge and others always said the
> >>>>Unix/Linux/Windows codebase is the same, only the lowest operating
> >>>>system layer is different. I guess this is the same for Oracle.
> >>>
> >>>No. Oracle comes with it's own Virtual Operating System on board.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Which I guess is almost the same as an operating system layer?
> >> I don't know how this is organized in the DB2 code but logically it
> >> should be the same as Oracle's VOS.
> >>
> >> Kind regards, Gert
> >
> > Always the same. I can take a PL/SQL package written on *NIX and
>
>> > change is required. Export from any one and import into any other.
> > run it on anything from a mainframe to Windows to a Mac and no code
>
> >
>
>> That way leads to lawyers and business megacorps and credit cards!
> --
> NO! There are no CODICILES of Fight Club! |||
> / | \
You can choose to have pl/sql compiled by a C compiler. Of course, you have to recompile on each platform if you want it compiled. Jim Received on Thu Mar 10 2005 - 19:36:52 CST
![]() |
![]() |