Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: .net and oracle's (10G) object relational features ?
Niall Litchfield wrote:
> "DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message
> news:1109953991.126024_at_yasure...
>
>>It should come as no surprise to anyone that at Oracle Corp. they >>are currently working on both versions 11 and 12 of the database. >>But no one is going to walk away from the product because we all >>know what they do will be very compatible with earlier versions >>and there will be a very easy upgrade/migration path. >> >>So why would anyone doubt that at Microsoft they are also working >>on the next version? That shouldn't be controversial. The question >>is more one of backward compatibility and that is the one place >>where Microsoft has repeatedly demonstrated a willingness to make >>its licensees recode and incur a huge cost of upgrading.
Well you can't very well look at the next unreleased version of .NET's successor product can you? So PHP5 is one alternative to starting a project with a technology that will likely require recoding sooner rather than later. And my experience with PHP so far has been a far better regard for developer's time and manager's budgets.
Of course you can still code against COM or even run DOS if you wish. Heck as anyone that knows me can tell you I still run Xtree Gold which is circa 1980's software under XP Pro. But then I'm not starting a new project with it.
-- Daniel A. Morgan University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)Received on Fri Mar 04 2005 - 15:14:16 CST
![]() |
![]() |