Ingo Peters wrote:
> On 2005-03-02, Frank van Bortel <fvanbortel_at_netscape.net> wrote:
>
>>I did not describe that; you conveniently snipped the quote
>>out of context.
>
>
> Sorry that you feel that way. It didn't snip anything to intentionally
> make a point, just that what I thought was relevant.
>
>
>>And by doing so, you also fail to quote the fact that fast
>>refreshes are not in order here; fast refreshes propagate
>>the *changes* (the alter, delete, alter, delete, etc stuff
>>that was in my original post).
>
>
> After rereading the OP's response I have to say I misread what is
> required and agree with you now. He's looking for a way to test updated
> data before rolling it out. Replication is not, in fact, the right
> approach.
>
> Ingo
>
Thank you
--
Regards,
Frank van Bortel
Received on Fri Mar 04 2005 - 03:51:20 CST
