Re: Db2, Oracle, SQL Server

Serge Rielau apparently said,on my timestamp of 19/02/2005 4:46 AM:
>
> Maybe you should:

Maybe I shouldn't. Don't like reading repeatedly.

> page 146 in the PDF file. Figure 7-1
> Maybe it's outdated or plain wrong. Can't find it in O10g.
> The metalink notes may help here (don't have access :-)
> That btw may explain the difference of opinion.

Maybe read the first few paragraphs?

>>> It depends on what kinds of accesses are being attempted against any
>>> data affected for as long as instance recovery is occurring.
>> As opposed to NO ACCESS at all in other databases.  

Exactly. Why do you think I was so shocked with the benchmark results quoted here?

-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam