DA Morgan wrote:
> Mark Townsend wrote:
>
>> > You don't
>>
>>> want a "select" only system to take row locks all the time, because
>>> table
>>> locks are much faster. Storing locks in memory is also faster than
>>> storing
>>> them on the blocks.
>>>
>>
>> Taking read locks at a table level: Faster
>> Storing read locks in memory : Faster
>> Not taking a read lock at all : Priceless
>>
>> Sorry. Couldn't resist
>
>
> And you missed a good dinner too.
Sorry. India.
Received on Thu Feb 10 2005 - 09:43:29 CST
