Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: New IBM Nonsense

Re: New IBM Nonsense

From: JEDIDIAH <jedi_at_nomad.mishnet>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:33:21 GMT
Message-ID: <1106861601.b97bf9ae94a4c793a546e7473a3dbaaf@1usenet>


On 2005-01-23, Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com> wrote:
> "Serge Rielau" <srielau_at_ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
> news:35hqkeF4lqkmqU1_at_individual.net...
>> To give the benchmark credit though: One can learn a lot from it as long
>> as one keeps in mind that it's a benchmark.
>
> I believe that I am correct in saying that the initial impetus for both the
> wait interface in Oracle7 and the dtrace facility in Solaris10 was
> unexpectedly low performance with no real diagnostics metrics available. I
> hope the same problems will be encountered by Microsoft for SQL2005 and some
> one with sufficient clout will be able to get instrumentation into linux.

        Linux instrumentation of that sort is already under development and has been for some time. Dtrace is more robust perhaps but it is hardly unique. It's sputnik with 3 US military ICBM programs hot on it's tail.

-- 
     If you think that an 80G disk can hold HUNDRENDS of           |||
hours of DV video then you obviously haven't used iMovie either.  / | \




                                                     
Received on Thu Jan 27 2005 - 15:33:21 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US