DH wrote:
> "Mark A" <nobody_at_nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:YYidndF07OuUQWvcRVn-2A_at_comcast.com...
>
>>"Jim" <no-spam_at_no-spam.org> wrote in message
>>news:d7mdv0552m04gccmphbgcl1jqheip2g2jd_at_4ax.com...
>>
>>>Thank you. Your point is...?
>>
>>I did not have any point. The post provided information from another
>>website concerning comparative database performance.
>>
>>I already apologized for posting it, since I did not know that this
>>information was posted and discussed here previously.
>>
>
>
> I don't see any reason why you apologize. The previous post on this topic
> was titled "New IBM Nonsense".
That is incorrect. The initial post was made to comp.databases.oracle
and was a pro-DB2 slam on Oracle. Go to google groups and look it up.
What you found here is a follow up response to the original post.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)
Received on Wed Jan 26 2005 - 16:37:20 CST
