Re: New IBM Nonsense

From: <thu.nnguyen_at_gmail.com>
Date: 23 Jan 2005 15:17:08 -0800
Message-ID: <1106522228.190417.241480@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>

DA Morgan wrote:
> thu.nnguyen_at_gmail.com wrote:
>
> > As for more
> > clients/spindle .. well if the system can handle it, they would
need
> > more clients/spindles.
>
> So your statement is that disk i/o is irrelevant to benchmark
results.
> Please point out the source of this fascinating revelation.

Of course not, but if you put in extra spindles or add extra clients on a system that is already CPU saturated, you won't get any better performance. You obviously don't know much about performance tuning.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Daniel A. Morgan
> University of Washington
> damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
> (replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)
>
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>100,000 Newsgroups
> ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
Received on Sun Jan 23 2005 - 17:17:08 CST