Re: New IBM Nonsense

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:17:06 -0800
Message-ID: <41f41445$1_1@127.0.0.1>

thu.nnguyen_at_gmail.com wrote:

> I already cited a head to head result. DB2 was faster.

At what database size? Did you look at that? For that size of database I might opt for MS Access or 3x5 cards.

Also look at the graph at the top. Does it reflect the one, and only, potentially reasonable result? NO! It is a blivet.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)

Received on Sun Jan 23 2005 - 15:17:06 CST