Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: One control file/redo member with ASM ok?
Thomas Kyte wrote:
> In article <beolu01umcqbaft3pmdmu5isst1c4as0bg_at_4ax.com>, Sybrand Bakker says...
>
>>On 16 Jan 2005 10:25:25 -0800, domenicg_at_hotmail.com (Domenic) wrote: >> >> >>>Is it acceptable to use one control file and one redo log member only >>>(per group) on a database using ASM, where ASM is doing the mirroring? >>>What's Oracle's recommendation/opinion on this? Wouldn't two control >>>files and two redo members per group be overkill when ASM is doing the >>>mirroring also? >>> >>>Domenic. >> >>Oracle requires 2 control files. It won't start without 2 control >>files. >>Mirroring only protects you against hardware failure. >>It doesn't protect you against someone inadvertently deleting a >>controlfile. >>Also the controlfile is usually only a few Mb's big. It would be very >>strange to try to save a few Mb's and instead increase the risk >>someone blows up your database. >> >> >>-- >>Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
I have mixed feelings on this one.
While technically you are correct ... advising someone that they can do this invites a very dangerous behaviour. Companies may suffer greviously because someone reads this as Tom Kyte saying it is ok. And even I would gleefully do what you recommend or what I assume you have sanctioned.
-- Daniel A. Morgan University of Washington damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with 'u' to respond) ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---Received on Sun Jan 16 2005 - 20:08:32 CST
![]() |
![]() |