Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: What Would Cause....

Re: What Would Cause....

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 17:29:25 -0800
Message-ID: <1102210068.837615@yasure>


Howard J. Rogers wrote:
> Niall Litchfield wrote:
>

>> "Harvey" <harveyb_at_NoSpambeliveau.ccHere> wrote in message 
>> news:41B06DE3.9C679990_at_NoSpambeliveau.ccHere...
>>
>>> Hi All:
>>>
>>> I've encountered this situation twice, and I'm not sure of what the
>>> cause is.  If anyone has a hint of where to look I'd appreciate it.
>>>
>>> The problem - when looking at a database via DBA Studio I go to Storage
>>> and then Tablespaces to display the list/utilization.  Generally
>>> speaking this takes a few seconds to load/display, however, what I'm
>>> encountering are significant delays, in the order of up to ten minutes.
>>> I've had two databases that were configured identically, with one
>>> displaying this behavior and the other working fine.  There's nothing
>>> remarkable in the alert logs.  Any ideas/suggestions?
>>>
>>> The environment - Oracle 8.1.7.4 on Solaris 8.  (The environment for the
>>> first encounter of this type was Oracle 8.1.7.4 on Windows 2000).
>>
>>
>>
>> I wonder if the *slow* tablespaces are in fact dictionary managed and 
>> have rather a lot of extents in the objects in them, whereas the 
>> *fast* ones are locally managed.
>> You can however find out rather than guessing. You can trace the dba 
>> studio session and then see (using tkprof, traceanalyser or some other 
>> tool) what is consuming the time. ten minutes does sound excessive.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>

>
>
> I realise we don't have to guess, because the OP could test as you
> describe. But I'd like to predict that the slowly-displaying tablespaces
> will actually be the locally-managed ones. And the fast-displaying ones
> will be dictionary-managed. Not out of perversity, but because extent
> calculations are the one thing LMTs do worse than DMTs.
>
> It will be interesting to see whether the style of extent management has
> anything to do with this at all!
>
> Regards
> HJR
Just to be contrary I'll posit that it is neither. I can't see any difference in asking the equivalent question in SQL*Plus so I'll put my money on the fact that it is the tool and not the database.
-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)
Received on Sat Dec 04 2004 - 19:29:25 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US