Re: oracle - mysql comparison

From: VC <boston103_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:00:17 GMT
Message-ID: <57NLc.4582$eM2.1702@attbi_s51>

"Daniel Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:1090474999.284806_at_yasure...
> VC wrote:
>
> > That's true. The only difference is that Oracle relies on exclusive
locks
> > thus preventing parallel 'select for updates' and the locking database
uses
> > shared locks that do not inhibit concurrent selects of the parent row.
> >
> > VC
>
> Since when does your ignorance translate into Oracle's weakness?

I'll skip the above utterance as a non sequitur.

>
> You still haven't addressed how you could handle the bank transaction
> question I posted many days ago.

I've already addressed the reporting issue more than once.

>
> Daniel Morgan
>
Received on Thu Jul 22 2004 - 06:00:17 CDT